In the face of a mystery, I can not
give an answer. Before a dilemma, I can not choose one horn or the
other. It seems that doing so misses the truly remarkable point: that
a mystery exists here.
If I understand Wittgenstein, his
position was that mysteries occurred from the misuse of language, of
applying concepts incorrectly and looking from the wrong point of
view. The correct answer was to look at the situation differently
until one found a perspective where the mystery dissolved into thin
air and one could move on.
I am not there yet with Wittgenstein,
either because I shall eventually regard Wittgenstein as wrong or
because I have not yet fully seen the merit of his method. For me, at
least at this moment, mysteries are places to stop and stare and
wonder why we can not advance knowledge there. The method that I
would use there is to stop and jot down the different possible
positions one could take in the face of a mystery, and then consider
why it is that one of them is not clearly true.
No comments:
Post a Comment